Legal Opinion
Mansfield v. Chicago Park District Group Plan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 5, 1996No. 95 C 3217PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Mansfield (“Mansfield”) is suing the Chicago Park District and the Chicago Park District Group Plan (“the Park District”). Count one of Mansfield’s two-count complaint alleges that defendants violated the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) amendments to both the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and the Public Health Service Act (“PHSA”). In count two, Mansfield contends that the Park District’s breach of these federal statutes constitutes a violation of his civil rights…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brett v. Jefferson County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Hanlon v. Town of MiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Orlofske v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Padilla v. County of CookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Bio-Medical Applications of Illinois, Inc. v. City of West FrankfortDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.