Legal Opinion
Baird v. Leidos, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 13, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00060Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN BAIRD, Case No.: 22cv0060-LL-BGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 LEIDOS, INC., [ECF No. 46] 15 Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant Leidos, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Leidos”) Motion for 18 Summary Judgment. ECF No. 46. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment has been 19 fully briefed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission without oral argument. For 20 the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 21 in its entirety.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.