Rasmussen v. Stanfield
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORIARTY, C.
The appellant, Herman Rasmussen, brought this action to secure a decree canceling and declaring void a certain mortgage foreclosure and the sheriff’s deed issued to respondent Joseph Peterka, pursuant to such foreclosure, and adjudging a certain mortgage held by appellant to be a valid first lien on the land described in said sheriff’s deed.
There is practically no dispute as to the facts, which are as follows: i
In March, 1920, the respondent Joseph Peterka conveyed to Carl Stanfield a tract of land in Hand county. On March 1, 1920, said Carl Stanfield and his wife mortgaged said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fruth v. BoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Brown v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Toston v. Utah Mortgage Loan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Benson v. BensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Bowe v. LongstaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.