Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Stanfield

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1925No. File No. 5456PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

The appellant, Herman Rasmussen, brought this action to secure a decree canceling and declaring void a certain mortgage foreclosure and the sheriff’s deed issued to respondent Joseph Peterka, pursuant to such foreclosure, and adjudging a certain mortgage held by appellant to be a valid first lien on the land described in said sheriff’s deed.

There is practically no dispute as to the facts, which are as follows: i

In March, 1920, the respondent Joseph Peterka conveyed to Carl Stanfield a tract of land in Hand county. On March 1, 1920, said Carl Stanfield and his wife mortgaged said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fruth v. BoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brown v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Toston v. Utah Mortgage Loan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Benson v. BensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bowe v. LongstaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API