Legal Opinion

Bowe v. Longstaff

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1929No. File No. 6587PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFO'LLEiY, J.

On the 15th day of June, 1906, one Longstaff and wife, two of the defendants herein, gave to- Huron College a note and mortgage for $4,000. On or about the 1st day of May, 1922, this note and mortgage with unpaid interest were sold and assigned to Andrew Riegel for $4,800; on the 10th day of October, 19a 7, the Longstaffs gave to said Riegel their other note and mortgage for $15,000; and on or about the 9th day of June, 1923, both of said" notes and mortgages were assigned to this plaintiff.

O11 the 3d day of January, 1922, the said Longstaffs, 'being-indebted to defendant the City National…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Rasmussen v. StanfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fruth v. BoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Polchow v. RoseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. BoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API