Grum v. Barney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order granting the defendant a new trial, in the Sixth District Court, County of Yolo. Denson, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The plaintiff avers that, on a certain day, he was the owner and in possession of certain personal property, and that so being the owner and in possession, the defendant wrongfully took the same, etc., and has ever since withheld, etc. Defendant denies that plaintiff is or was at the times mentioned in the complaint the owner, or entitled to the possession, and alleges that one Lambert was the owner and in possession; that one Asberry recovered a judgment against Lambert; that an execution was duly issued thereon, and placed in the hands of defendant, (alleged to be Sheriff) who…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mason v. VestalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tapscott v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Banning v. MarleauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.