People v. McGilver
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The-defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the first degree. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
The appellant McGilver was accused jointly with one Mark M. Lay of the crime of burglary, committed by entering the house of H. Wempe on the 14th of June, 1884, with intent to commit larceny. The appellant was separately tried,
On the trial one G. Wempe gave evidence concerning the ownership of the house. He stated: “My father owns the house.” “It is my father's and mother's; my father owns the house;” “the deed runs to my father and mother; my father and mother both own the lot, and my father and mother built the house; my father and mother own the house.” Ho evidence was given as to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. EbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.