Legal Opinion

Amaechi v. Clark

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 25, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MENZA, J.S.C.

The defendants move for summary judgment, contending that the plaintiff, Louise E. Clark, has failed to meet category nine of the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A 39:6A-8(a) (disability for ninety days).

The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident on December 13,1991. Her doctor diagnosed her condition as a “post-traumatic injury” (sprain and strain) to the neck, chest, lower back, left calf and left knee. A consulting physician render a diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy. The plaintiff contends that she meets *188category nine of the verbal threshold1 because she became…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawrence Bushman and Gwenyth Bushman v. Henry J. Halm and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Kelly v. BorwegenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Gootz v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Costa v. BillingsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Williams v. DobranskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Espinal v. AriasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  2. Capello v. MarescaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API