Legal Opinion

Hillman Township Board v. Empire Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 35,349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant to recover their loss and damage, alleged to have been insured against, by defendant, resulting from the burning of a hall at Hillman, Michigan. Defendant pleaded the general issue and gave notice that at the time of the fire a picture show was being operated in the building insured in violation of Act No. 257, Pub. Acts 1913 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8867 et seq.); plaintiffs were guilty of gross negligence' causing the loss; the building insured was occupied for other purposes than those for which it was insured, and plaintiffs negligently permitted a motion picture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. ConnorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Yearnd v. Northern Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Peterson v. St. Clair Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Yearnd v. Northern InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pulford v. MouwMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hunter v. DoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Haara v. VreelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API