Legal Opinion

Troup v. Appleman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 16, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. The appellant instituted an action of attachment under the Act of 1864, ch. 306, to recover from the appellee the value of certain bonds, basing the action upon the ground that the defendant fraudulently contracted the debt or incurred the obligation in respect to which the action was brought. The Court helow quashed the attachment and the plaintiff appealed. The case is further stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrent, J.

This appeal is from the ruling of the Circuit Court for Washington County quashing an attachment, which had been issued in behalf of the appellant on the 12th of August, 1878, o

The appellant, about April, 1870, placed in the hands of the appellee, who was a partner with Ashury Gr. Apple-man, doing business in Hagerstown as bankers and brokers under the name of Appleman & Co., some government bonds, to be by him sold and invested in certain other named bonds, which latter bonds when so purchased were to remain in the custody of his firm for safe keeping. Whether the bonds were actually…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  2. Munich Re-Insurance Co. v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  3. Telma v. GingellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Sullivan v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. York Manufacturing Co. v. Hoblitzell National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API