Legal Opinion

Graves v. Rudman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

There is a marked difference between an action for malicious prosecution and one for false imprisonment. The essential element of the former is the fact that a judicial proceeding has been commenced and prosecuted maliciously and without probable cause, while the gist of the latter is an unlawful detention. (Brown v. Chadsey, 39 Barb. 253; Barry v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 51 App. Div. 385.)

The complaint in the instant case states a cause of action for malicious prosecution, and not for false imprisonment. The case, however, was tried and sent to the jury upon both theories. This was done…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. ChadseyNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Barry v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Du FreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Schulman v. Modern Industrial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Francisco v. Little Falls Dairy Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Grace v. Dry Dock Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API