Grace v. Dry Dock Savings Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.
The complaint herein is for brokerage commissions allegedly due pursuant to contract. Grace (the plaintiff), Dry Dock Savings Bank (the defendant and interpleading plaintiff), and the Knolls Cooperative Section No. 2, Inc. (the interpleaded defendant) specified by written agreement that plaintiff 6 ‘ is the *557only party in the capacity of broker or otherwise who has negotiated for the placing of ” a mortgage loan by Knolls with Dry Dock, and that Dry Dock was to pay to the plaintiff “ as and for his brokerage or commissions in full an amount equivalent to 1 -%% of the principal amount of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Folinsbee v. . SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Buckin v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Leonard v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- McCabe v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Manufacturer's & Traders Trust Co. v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006