Legal Opinion

Fuentes v. Planet Fitness

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 19, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00818Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Pete Fuentes, No. CV-21-00818-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Planet Fitness, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Defendant United PF TOM, LLC d/b/a Planet Fitness United (“Planet Fitness”) 17 moves for summary judgment. (Doc. 58.) Summary judgment is appropriate when there 18 is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and, viewing those facts in a light most 19 favorable to the nonmoving party, the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 20 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Summary judgment may also be entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Elrod v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Lowe v. City of MonroviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. No. 03-55824Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API