Legal Opinion
ESTES v. 3M COMPANY
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided February 10, 2021No. 7:20-cv-00137Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS Case No. 3:19md2885 EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Judge M. Casey Rodgers Estes, 7:20cv137 Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 23. On full consideration, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Legal Standard Summary judgment is appropriate where there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Self v. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE GEORGIA BAPTIST CONVENTION OF GEORGIA, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.