McCarthy v. Belcher
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBronson, P.J.
I concur with the majority’s conclusion that there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to deny defendants’ motion for a mistrial. However, I disagree with the majority’s disposition of the second issue raised in this appeal. I believe that the court acted properly in excluding Dr. Wu’s deposition.
First, I find little difficulty in characterizing Dr. Wu as a physician consulted for the purpose of preparing for litigation. Lindsay v Lipson, 367 Mich 1; 116 NW2d 60 (1962). It is undisputed that in February or March, 1978, plaintiff’s trial attorney instructed plaintiff to go…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindsay v. LipsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Passmore v. Estate of PassmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Polish Roman Catholic Union v. PalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Leverich v. LeverichMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.