Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Griffith v. Matassarin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1923No. 25,111PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, brought in the name of the state on the relation of the attorney-general to determine the membership of the state board of health, *246and also as to who is entitled to the office of secretary of that board. The plaintiff alleged that the state board of health is composed of the following named persons who were legally appointed, were duly qualified and are acting members of the board, namely: Dr. J. E. Hawley, Dr. J. J. Entz, Dr. C. H. Lerrigo, Dr. J. T. Axtell, Dr. F. W. Landrum, Dr. H. L.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. GridleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Schmulbach v. SpeidelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Dalrymple v. StockwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Alliance Coöperative Insurance v. GascheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Carpenter v. TitusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Todd v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. State ex rel. Schmidt v. Governor KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Driscoll v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API