State ex rel. Griffith v. Matassarin
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in quo warranto.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, brought in the name of the state on the relation of the attorney-general to determine the membership of the state board of health, *246and also as to who is entitled to the office of secretary of that board. The plaintiff alleged that the state board of health is composed of the following named persons who were legally appointed, were duly qualified and are acting members of the board, namely: Dr. J. E. Hawley, Dr. J. J. Entz, Dr. C. H. Lerrigo, Dr. J. T. Axtell, Dr. F. W. Landrum, Dr. H. L.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. GridleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Schmulbach v. SpeidelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Dalrymple v. StockwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Alliance Coöperative Insurance v. GascheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Carpenter v. TitusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Todd v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State ex rel. Schmidt v. Governor KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Driscoll v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.