Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 12, 1917No. 21317PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Grant; James Andrew, Judge. Action by A. H. Haynes against the Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

The mixed train of the defendant company, on which plaintiff was a passenger, was wrecked; and he suffered an inguinal hernia, with some bruises; .for which he asked $11,000 in damages. The jury rendered a verdict in his favor for $2,-000. Defendant appealed. Plaintiff, on his brief, refers to an answer to the appeal filed by him, in which he asked for an amendment of the judgment, and an increase to $5,000; but the answer is not found in the record.

Plaintiff charges fault and neglect on the part of defendant, and says that the wreck of the train and the injury to him were due to the bad and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Donovan v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. LeBlanc v. SweetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Patton v. PicklesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  4. Chicago City Railway Co. v. McMeenIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. SoudersIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Bynum v. City of MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Hart v. Gulf, M. N. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Alford v. Bisso Ferry Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API