Jameson v. James
California Supreme Court
• The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The demurrer of the defendant John P. Cuddebacb, to plaintiffs’ amended complaint having been sustained, and plaintiffs having failed to further amend within the time allowed by the court, judgment of dismissal was entered. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The amended complaint alleges that on March 31, 1899, the plaintiffs made a mineral location of forty acres of land in Kern County. The land contained limestone in large quantities, and was' far more valuable for said limestone than for atiy other purpose. Immediately after said location the plaintiffs entered into possession of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Lee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. LuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Van Ness v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Earl v. MorrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1915
- Bond v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Sanders v. DutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.