Legal Opinion

Forcino v. National Railroad Passenger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1996No. 95-991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. SHARP, Judge.

Thomas Forcino appeals from an order granting a motion for summary judgment filed by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) in a personal injury action.1 Forcino, an Amtrak employee, was injured while attempting to répair a track following a train derailment at one of Amtrak’s railroad yards. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to allow a jury to decide whether Amtrak’s negligence played any part in producing Forcino’s injury and remand the cause for further proceedings.

On January 12, 1993, a derailment occurred at Amtrak’s railroad yard in Sanford,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crystal Sells, as Personal, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Crystal Sells, as Personal, etc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Priscilla Lewis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Clarence Lewis v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API