Legal Opinion · Dissent

Montgomery v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 2004No. 3903Published

1DissentGoolsby, J.

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the trial court’s determination that Montgomery failed to present sufficient evidence to survive summary judgment on any of his three theories of CSX’s alleged negligence under FELA.

A FELA action in state court is controlled by federal substantive law.1 I agree that, under the federal FELA standard, a plaintiff in a FELA case need only show that the “employer’s negligence played any part, even the slightest, in producing the injury.”2 Nevertheless, although the quantum *551of evidence sufficient to present a jury question of causation in a FELA case is less…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Donald Moody v. Maine Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API