Riverside Cotton Mills v. Green
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Danville, rendered January 21, 1899, in an action of trespass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Harrison, J.,
delivered the,opinion of the court.
This action was instituted to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been received by the plaintiff while engaged as *59an employee in the cotton mills of the defendant company. The ■declaration avers negligence in several particulars, but no attempt is made to sustain any allegation except that which charges the defendant with failure to furnish safe and suitable machinery. The plaintiff entered the employment of the defendant in April, 1897, and the injury complained of was received on the 7th of the following January. It appears that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bertha Zinc Co. v. Martin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Ellington's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- Lay v. Elk Ridge Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Parlett v. DunnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Southern Railway Co. v. ChildreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Southern Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.