Legal Opinion

Parlett v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 10, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Oourt of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk in an action of trespass on the case, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is an action by an employee to recover damages from his employer for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of the latter in failing to provide for the plaintiff a reasonably safe place in which, and reasonably safe and suitable appliances or machinery with which, to work.

The defendant, C. R. Parlett, as general contractor, was building a warehouse in the city of Norfolk, upon which the plaintiff was working at the time of the accident. Through the building, fifteen or sixteen feet apart, were upright pillars, upon which rested horizontal girders, 12 by 14 inches. On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bertha Zinc Co. v. Martin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Richmond Locomotive Works v. FordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Cromer's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  4. Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Co. v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. MauzySupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reilly v. NicollWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. Tomlinson's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. A. H. Jacoby Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Foster's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  5. Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. Cruise's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API