Legal Opinion

Copp v. Paradis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 20, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

Action on the case to recover property damages resulting from the negligent operation of the defendant’s truck by a person invited to ride and permitted to drive by the defendant’s servant. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, a nonsuit was entered and exceptions reserved.

The evidence warrants the finding that, on September 5, 1930, the defendant’s truck driver, Arthur Tancread, having been ordered to haul a load of supplies from Lewiston to Dead River, in*466vited a friend, Leo Carpenter, to accompany him. Taijcread drove until they stopped for gas on the return trip, when he permitted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Haluptzok v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Hollidge v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Armstrong v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. FrostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  2. Chaput v. LussierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Leek v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  4. West Texas Produce Co. v. PateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Medeiros v. Honolulu Motor Coach Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API