Legal Opinion

Gloria Carignan v. Paul R. Dumas Jr.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 19, 2017No. Docket: Oxf-16-82PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Paul R. Dumas Jr. appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Oxford County, Clifford, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of Gloria Carignan and denying Dumas’s motion for summary judgment. Dumas contends that the court erred by interpreting a provision of the Paper Streets Act, 23 M.R.S. § 3031 (2016), to apply retrospectively. We agree, and therefore vacate the court’s entry of summary judgment for Carignan and its denial of summary judgment for Dumas, and remand for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2] The summary judgment record contains the following facts. Brady v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. Gerard Brady v. Cumberland CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. Glidden v. BeldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Beneficial Maine Inc. v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Paul Remmes v. The Mark Travel CorporationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gloria Carignan v. Paul R. Dumas Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API