Legal Opinion

City of Marlborough v. City of Lowell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 17, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

Alfred Messier had a legal settlement in Lowell, but lived in Marlborough with his wife and two minor children. They were “in distress and standing in need of immediate relief” within G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 117, § 14 (see now St. 1937, c. 113). The plaintiff furnished relief to them between December 4, 1931, and March 4, 1933, to the extent of $432.55, and seeks reimbursement, from the defendant.

The only question is, whether the plaintiff must give credit for work worth $363.27, which Messier performed “as directed” by the welfare department of the plaintiff, without receiving any wages. Since…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orlando v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Beverly Hospital v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Inhabitants of Dalton v. Inhabitants of HinsdaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  4. Miller v. Inhabitants of SomersetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  5. Commonwealth v. PouliotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Worcester v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Chaffee v. Town of OxfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Scordis's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Beakey v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Inhabitants of Rowe v. CoolbrithMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API