Legal Opinion

Foster v. City of Augusta

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1953No. 38,898, 38,892PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

These consolidated four cases are the fourth appearance in this court involving the parties in their actions to recover damages from the City of Augusta alleged to have resulted to their property by reason of the construction of a flood control levee under G. S. 1949, 12-635 et seq. The legal and factual background of these consolidated appeals is set forth in our three former opinions in Loomis v. City of Augusta, 151 Kan. 343, 99 P. 2d 988; Foster v. City of Augusta, 165 Kan. 684, 199 P. 2d 779, and Foster v. City of Augusta, 170 Kan. 5,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Burden v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. City of St. Louis v. RossiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Barnes v. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Grand River Dam Authority v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Rasing v. HealzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Landrum v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Garrett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Johnson v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Williams v. LawtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Johnson v. HauptCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API