Legal Opinion

Urdang v. Mahrer, Krause, Lubert, Berman & Bennett

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1959No. 24530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, overruling defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $15,000, and from a judgment for the plaintiff and against the defendant entered on the verdict of a jury.

DOYLE, PJ,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mrs. Urdang, 7.6 years of age and suffering from stomach diseomforture, traveled alone by bus from her home to the Cleveland Fair-mount Boulevard offices of the defendant doctors, who specialized there in the taking of x-ray pictures, for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Main v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Albachten v. Golden RuleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Wessner v. Blue Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Wiley v. WhartonOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buerger v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Finley v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
  3. Besst v. Zann's Family Restaurant, Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-19-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Hawthorne v. DaVita Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API