Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Fife

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2017No. 20160305PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Anne Fahey, Timothy Fife and Richard D. Fife (Plaintiffs) appeal from a district court judgment in their action seeking cancellation of a quit claim deed from their deceased mother Marianne Fife to their deceased father Richard A. Fife relating to North Dakota minerals. The court rescinded the deed but concluded that under North Dakota’s intestacy laws in effect at Marianne. Fife’s death, the minerals passed to Richard A. Fife. The court concluded Richard A. Fife’s surviving spouse Joanne Fife owns the minerals. We affirm.

I

Eli’2] Marianne Fife owned a mineral interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Adams v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hallin v. Inland Oil & Gas CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. RendeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Estate of BrandtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Puklich v. PuklichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Albrecht v. Albrecht (In Re Estate of Albrecht)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API