Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Bowles v. Burrell

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtRumsey, J.

It appears from the affidavits presented upon this application that during the year 1894 the relator sold and *218delivered to the highway commissioner of the town of Canis.teo a large quantity of plank, timber and piles, to be used and which were used in the- repair of the roads and bridges of said town.. His account was presented to . the board of audit at the-proper time in the fall of the year 1894: It was objected to,, and-after some hesitation the town, board refused to audit it. ■ He makes this motion to procúre a writ of mandamus-, to-require them to audit this account. "

It appears, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. . the Town of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. People Ex Rel. Everett v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Morson v. Town of GravesendNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John Lyth & Sons v. Town of Evans, New York County Courts1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API