Legal Opinion

Bloomberg v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1984No. B001001PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, Acting P. J.

This appeal is taken from a dismissal following a sustained demurrer to appellants’ third amended complaint (complaint). Appellants Ronald and Barbara Bloomberg allege that respondent Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California (respondent or Auto Club), 1 by its negligence, caused the death of appellants’ 16-year-old son. The bases of the demurrer were two: respondent owed no duty of care to appellants’ son, and, if it did, the criminal act of an intoxicated driver was a superseding, intervening cause cutting off respondent’s liability as a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Leslie G. v. Perry & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Pierce v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Jackson v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Aim Insurance Co. v. CulcasiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API