Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Caltex Petroleum Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
In this action for specific performance of an “Incentive Compensation Plan” (ICP), the five plaintiffs, all former employees of the defendant Caltex Petroleum Corporation (Caltex), move for summary judgment or, in the alternative, for summary judgment in favor of four of them and a hearing with respect to a release allegedly given by the fifth, the plaintiff Schaberg. Defendant Caltex cross-moves for leave to examine the plaintiffs and to stay the motion for summary judgment until after the depositions of plaintiffs have been taken.
The plaintiffs were employed by Caltex for periods ranging…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McNevin v. Solvay Process Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Gearns v. Commercial Cable Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Gorr v. Consolidated Foods Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- McNevin v. . Solvay Process CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Dolge v. DolgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Titsch v. Reliance Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Hansen v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schlansky v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- B. Elmer Moore v. The Home Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Topper v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978