Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff properly admits that ordinary jerks or lurches in the stopping or starting of an electric street car do not constitute negligence in handling the car, and do not subject the operating company to liability, even though damage to a passenger results. McGann v. Boston Elevated Railway, 199 Mass. 446. She contends, however, that in this case there is evidence of something more than an ordinary jerk or lurch. The conductor had undertaken to stop the car at her stopping place. When she got up to leave the car it was going very fast and gave no indication of stopping where she had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGann v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Anderson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Convery v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Craig v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Griffin v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Seidenberg v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Wade v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Weiner v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Warren v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Dethloff v. Zeigler Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API