Legal Opinion

Holsz v. Stephen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1936No. 23148. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

The circuit court of Cook county dismissed, for want of equity, a bill of complaint by Anna Holsz and a cross-bill by her son, George Holsz, against Hattie A. Stephen, individually and as executrix, and as sole legatee and devisee, under the last will of Frank Kelly, deceased. An appeal to this court was taken by the complainant and the cross-complainant.

Anna Holsz was a widow. Pier son, George, was unmarried. The basis of the bill and cross-bill is an alleged contract whereby Kelly agreed to devise and bequeath to Anna Holsz all of his property except his dwelling, which he was to leave to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weir v. WeirIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Weber v. AdlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Edwards v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kohlbrecher v. GuettermannIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Shaver v. WickwireIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Monetti, S.P.A., and Melform U.S.A., Inc. v. Anchor Hocking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Chambers v. AppelIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lipkin v. KorenIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rose v. DolejsIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API