Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 21, 2018No. Appellate Case No. 2017-000640; Opinion No. 27847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE HEARN :

**387We granted certiorari on the narrow question of whether a creditor may execute on a judgment more than ten years after its enrollment when the time period has expired during the course of litigation. Our resolution of this case requires us to revisit our decision in Linda Mc ,1 which the court of appeals broadly interpreted as extending a judgment's life beyond the statutory ten-year limit merely by filing the action within ten years. Gordon v. Lancaster , 419 S.C. 48, 795 S.E.2d 857 (Ct. App. 2016). We reverse and overrule Linda Mc .

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In December of 2001,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Hardee v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. United States Rubber Co. v. McManusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. Garrison v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Nash v. Tindall Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ben Robert Stewart v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
  2. Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. v. HolmesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  3. Wells Fargo Bank National Association v. Mark A. SearcyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API