Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. HENDRICKSON ET UX.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, J.

This is a mechanic’s lien foreclosure. Plaintiff, as contractor, and defendants, as owners, entered into a written contract wherein and whereby plaintiff engaged to erect a dwelling house for the defendants on their property in Portland, pursuant to plans and specifications, for the sum of $7,775.00. After the house was erected, defendants moved into the same, paying on the contract the sum of $6,972.76. Plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien for the balance of $812.24 and proceeded to foreclose the same. Defendants answered, and after making certain admissions and denials, pleaded a counterclaim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanna v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Gabel v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hattrem v. BurdickOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Empire Building Supply, Inc. v. EKO Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Glaser v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Allan & Leuthold, Inc. v. TERRA INVESTMENT COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jacobson v. WHEELEROregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Shepherd v. GassOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API