Legal Opinion

Etedali v. Town of Danvers

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 20, 2009Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrant, J.

From June 12, 2000 until his resignation on December 11, 2004, plaintiff Darush Mario Etedali (“Etedali”) worked as a systems engineer for the Danvers Municipal Light Department, a department within the government of the defendant, town of Danvers (“Danvers”). Throughout his employment, Etedali was a member of a union that acted as the collective bargaining agent for him. At first, his union was Local 25 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (‘Teamsters”). Later, after the decertification of the Teamsters, Etedali was represented by the Danvers Independent Employees Group (“DIEG”).

Duri…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. O'Brien v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. James Saunders v. Amoco Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Flomenbaum v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API