Legal Opinion

James Saunders v. Amoco Pipeline Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1991No. 90-1045PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action against his former employer in state court, asserting two claims challenging the termination of his employment: 1) defendant created a hostile work environment which forced plaintiff to resign his position, amounting to a constructive discharge; and 2) defendant was negligent in maintaining a hostile work environment. Defendant removed this action to federal court based upon diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 1 We affirm.

This court will review an order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Everett E. Hodges, III v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipe Fitting Industry Of The United States And Canada, Local Number 57 v. Bechtel Power CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Charlie Milton v. Scrivner, Inc., Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Thomas Quesnel v. Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Sarsycki v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Cisneros v. ABC Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re Paris Packaging, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API