Legal Opinion · Dissent

Killen v. Independent School District No. 706

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1996No. CX-95-2505Published

1DissentMansur, Judge

I concur with the majority’s decision that the school district is entitled to discretionary function immunity with respect to its failure to adopt a suicide prevention policy. I do note, however, that two separate and distinct decisions are involved here: the first is the failure to adopt a written suicide prevention policy, and the second is the school district’s delegation of decisions involving suicidal students to its guidance counselors.

I respectfully dissent on the issue of whether Fabish (and the school district vicariously) is entitled to official immunity for the decision not to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, BrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Eisel v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. People v. TomkoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Terwilliger v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API