Legal Opinion
Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan P.C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 1990No. 8560PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s denial of his application to vacate an arbitration award. The plaintiff claims that the trial court incorrectly held that he waived his objection to the arbitration proceedings by his continued participation in the proceedings. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The facts are not in dispute. On or about June 17, 1986, the defendant law firm filed a grievance against the plaintiff, a former employee, claiming that the plaintiff had removed files and recordings belonging to the defendant. At the suggestion of the grievance committee, the parties…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Waterbury Board of Education v. Waterbury Teachers Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Bennett v. MeaderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Southern New England Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- White v. KampnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Cashman v. Sullivan & Donegan, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Controlled Castings v. the Purdy Corp., No. Cv 93-0455242s (Aug. 8, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Granger Sons v. Envirotest Sys., No. Cv 98-0584269s (May 19, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Hartford Co. v. Underwriters Ins., No. Cv 02-0814620 S (Jul. 31, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.