Legal Opinion

Searfoss v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1986No. 02861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of appellee, Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. (“Avis”), and against appellants after the distinguished Judge Patrick J. Toole, Jr. construed the terms of the car rental agreement entered into between Avis and Richard H. Paterson, Sr. and concluded that Avis had no duty to defend or to provide liability coverage under the terms of the rental agreement. We affirm in this case of first impression in Pennsylvania.

Appellants claim that the operation of the rental vehicle by Richard Harter Paterson, Jr. was a permitted use…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Belas v. MelanovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Phillips v. Henkels & McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Powell v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Lonesathirath v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Tico Insurance v. MarchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API