Legal Opinion
Gray v. Robert Plan Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1998No. CV96-4880 (DRH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in this employment discrimination action is Defendant The Robert Plan Corporation’s (“RPC’s”) motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Martin Gray was hired by RPC as an insurance underwriter on March 1, 1993: (CompU 8.) Plaintiff was sixty-three years of age at the time of his hiring, and sixty-six years of age at the time of his termination on June 27, 1996. (Id. ¶ 7; Finnegan Certification (“Certif.”)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kolesnikow v. Hudson Valley Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- O'SULLIVAN v. New York TimesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Welch v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021