Legal Opinion

James v. Kentucky Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 17, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. R. L. Stout, Circuit Judge. Decree for complainant, defendant appeals

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice O’Rear

Reversing.

Appellee is a domestic corporation, whose principal *355business is the manufacture of oil from, cotton seed,' the refining and sale of such oil, and dealing in the, by-products of the manufacture1. It owns and operates 1 200 or more tank cars for transporting its oil to market and to its customers. The cars are the familiar oil tank railroad cars in general use for transporting oil in large quantities. Appellee used all its cars in its own business. The method is to hire the cars to the transporting railroads at so much per mile; appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Cent. R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Commonwealth v. LedmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Louisville Tank Line Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. CoulterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. SebreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Louisville & N. R. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
  3. Bemis Bro. Bag Company v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Revenue Cabinet v. Comcast Cablevision of the SouthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API