Legal Opinion

McKinstry v. Carter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from, Comanche District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This action was commenced in the court below by James McKinstry, to recover an interest in certain real estate situate in that county, or its value if partition could not be made. He claimed under a conveyance from W. R. Colcord, who, he alleged, was interested, with W. H. Carter, Thomas B. Campbell and Prank Thornton in the real estate described in his petition. The case was tried before the court with a jury, and the jury found, among other things, that W. R. Colcord owned at one time an undivided one-fourth interest in the land in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lender v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868
  2. Ferguson v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. St. Louis Carbonating & Mfg. Co. v. Lookeba State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API