Legal Opinion
Davis v. Rockwell International Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 18, 1984No. Civ. A. C82-1417PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
This Memorandum and Order sets forth the reasons for this Court’s September 25, 1984 Order denying defendant Rockwell International Corporation’s (“Rockwell”) motion for summary judgment.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) provides subject matter jurisdiction in this diversity action.
I
Robert B. Davis was formerly employed as a mixer machine operator at Rockwell’s Reinforced Plastics Division (“the Division”) plant located in Ashtabula, Ohio. On May 28, 1980, his hand was partially crushed when it became caught between two power-driven rollers which are…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert J. Johnson v. Odeco Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of NYDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
- Johnson v. Odeco Oil & Gas Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1987
- Prokos v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.