Legal Opinion
Clark v. Perdue
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 27, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-0394Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHELLE CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-394 (JEB) THOMAS J. VILSACK, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to ensure that their electronic information and technology (EIT) is accessible to their employees with disabilities. Since January 2015, Plaintiff Michelle Clark, who is blind and works at the United States Department of Agriculture, has been trying to get her employer to comply. Over the past six years, her administrative complaints have pinballed around…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.