Legal Opinion
Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Russell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 6, 1949No. 3742PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action for the determination of title and recovery of possession of the real estate herein involved, located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
On January 3, 1903, appellees, C. O. Russell and Ruby Russell, were the owners in fee of the real estate in question. On that day they executed and delivered to Oklahoma County their warranty deed to the land for a consideration of $4,000. The deed contained this provision:
“This grant and conveyance is made however, subject to the following conditions :
“That if the said grantee shall fail and neglect- to have erected on said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Oregon & California Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mead v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Whalen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Stinson v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pirkey v. State Ex Rel. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Independent Congregational Society v. DavenportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- City of Casper v. J. M. Carey & BrotherWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- DeHart v. Ritenour Consolidated School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Genet v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.