Legal Opinion
M & D International Corp. v. Chan
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 3, 1995No. Civ. 93-00888HGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GILLMOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant M & D International Corporation and Defendants and counterclaimants Kevin Chan and King Lum, Inc. having appeared before this Court in the above-entitled action, this Court having considered the arguments, evidence and testimony presented, the Court issues the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
I.FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Defendant and counter claimant King Lum, Inc. (King Lum) is a Hawaii corporation and has been in the business of manufacturing and selling crystal sculptures since…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- S.O.S., Inc. v. Payday, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martha Graham School & Dance Foundation, Inc. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Latin American Music Co. v. American Society of ComposersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Roberts v. GordyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019