Legal Opinion

Lackawaxen Water & Sewer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 29 C.D. 1983 and 114 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barbieri,

The Lackawaxen Water & Sewer Company (Laekawaxen) appeals here from two orders of the Pennsylvania Public. Utility Commission (Commission) directing it, inter alia, to “return” sewer and water line connection fees paid by property owners in two developments. known as Masthope Rapids and Falling Waters at Masthope. We reverse.

Masthope Rapids and Falling Waters at Masthope are resort communities which were developed on two contiguous parcels of land by Masthope Rapids, Inc. and Falling Waters at Masthope, Inc. respectively. As these communities were built a common water…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Bell Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LavelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Borough of Middletown v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API