Legal Opinion
Hambuechen v. 221 Market North, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 2015No. 2013-1603PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
*162{¶ 1} This case presents a single question. In an R.C. 4112.06 action seeking judicial review of an order of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, what is the deadline to perfect service of a copy of the petition upon all the parties? There is no reason to depart from the well-accepted principle that the Rules of Civil Procedure are applicable to actions brought pursuant to R.C. 4112.06. Appellant, the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, argues that if the party seeking judicial review of the order does not ensure that service by the clerk’s office of the petition for review is initiated within 30…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clermont Cty. Transp. Improvement Dist. v. Gator Milford, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Abbyshire Construction Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
- City of Cleveland v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hambuechen v. 221 Market N., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Donn, Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gallick v. Franklin Cnty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Dillard v. Automation Tool & Die, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hambuechen v. 221 Market N., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hendy v. Ohio Civ. Rights. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Newman v. Ohio Civ. Rights. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019