Legal Opinion

Foster v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided June 4, 2025No. 8:24-cv-02617Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION DAVID A. FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:24-cv-02617-WFJ-TGW METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and MICHAEL KHALAF, Defendants. / ORDER Before the Court are Defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) and Michael Khalaf’s1 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Dkt. 36. Pro se Plaintiff David A. Foster has responded in opposition, Dkts. 37 & 40, and Defendants replied. Dkt. 42. The Court also permitted Plaintiff to file a surreply. Dkt. 43. As explained below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is granted.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. David Richard Moon v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API