Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Pierce

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is a contest of the will of T. W. Pierce. The jury found the testator was of unsound mind at the date of the execution of the will, in September, 1936, and the trial Judge, on overruling a motion for a new trial, approved the verdict. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Seeking a review in this Court, the Executor presents his petition for certiorari.

The contentions made on appeal and renewed by petition here relate, (1) to the refusal of the trial Judge to direct a verdict in favor of the will, (2) to his admission of testimony of lay witnesses expressing opinions, and (3) to his failure to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McBee v. BowmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Gage v. Railway CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hager v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Southern Motors, Inc. v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  3. Hammond v. Union Planters Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McMahan v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  5. Scott v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API